Mark Zuckerberg not to resign from Facebook over data breach

Adjust Comment Print

Mr Zuckerberg told Congress that Facebook is planning to give its users - including those in the U.S. and Canada - all new rights under GDPR.

The problem with free, of course, is that the entrepreneurs had to get their money from someone in order to have a business. Zuckerberg's success is a win for anyone primarily concerned with the company's market value.

For example, when it comes to facial recognition, Facebook is fighting against users consenting to have their faces recognized in photos. Apologizing is perhaps one of their true company values.

For most users this would have come about if they had previously downloaded the "This is your digital life" app. It's time for Facebook to really change.

That's an overstatement. Most basic information, like my birthday, could not be deleted.

The for-profit social media giant Facebook harvests vast amounts of data from each of its 2 billion users across the globe.

It's not just family members, though, who want us to be friends in an alternate universe.

The second and final day of his testimony to the US Congress regarding the Cambridge Analytica debacle was a travesty. App developers no longer get access to that data. This fact should raise questions about other mediums that have access to our information that we are unsuspecting of, like Facebook applications. It will also require political advertisers to provide additional transparency, as a new weapon in the reported "arms race" Facebook finds itself in with Russian propagandists.

All the time we (as users) waste on the site isn't an accident.

That structure could on the one hand end up disadvantaging less affluent users while simultaneously allowing wealthier consumers - the ones advertisers might be most eager to court - to bypass ads altogether.

THE Cambridge Analytica scandal and its resultant "revelations" have left a bad taste in the mouths of most Facebook users across the world.

Zuckerberg was transparent on this point as well. "We do not want to tax companies twice", he said. [Based mostly on demographic criteria].

Zuckerberg claimed that such behavior is consented to by users. As an early investor in Facebook, McNamee was only only a mentor to Mark Zuckerberg but also introduce him to Sheryl Sandberg. I started Facebook. I run it. And, yes, he made positive noises in response to a proposal by Sen. This is positive awareness. Last week, in a session with the US lawmakers, the 33-year old Zuckerberg admitted that he took the blame for the data scrape and emphasized that user privacy is of utmost importance to the firm.

Finally, will the apologies and the massive privacy breach under Zuckerberg's watch lead to an improved system of regulation? Your company has no core values if behavior is not aligned. A recent training in Houston covered Facebook for beginners, connecting with local shoppers, taking Facebook ads to the next level and workshops on financial readiness.

Another option may be to cut back on some of the features that Facebook is providing. And same goes for the teenagers. So, it seems that European Union regulations in this matter might make Facebook a bit uncomfortable to implement fully. The former head of the UN's global telecommunications regulator has said governments should "regard the internet as basic infrastructure - just like roads, waste and water". But who is actually suffering, Facebook or its users? In 2016 in an apparent bid to ensure his privacy he bought the four properties surrounding his Palo Alto home in California and tore them down to later build smaller houses. But what about all the potential harm Facebook's AI might create?

Unfortunately, existing regulations aren't suited to deal with the privacy issues at stake and new regulations are only going to protect certain citizens in certain pockets of the world. Zuckerberg stopped well short of that, but expressed willingness to work with Senators on legislation.

Nevertheless, Zuckerberg was light on details about how Facebook would better police political ads, according to University of North Carolina Professor Daniel Kreiss. Again, Facebook must be willing to hold employees to corporate values. Zuckerberg would not admit he feels like a monopoly, but he couldn't name a true competitor.

But whether its lack of decline in user numbers due to lack of privacy concerns or lack of competitors is very much up to debate.